Gospel & Culture blog
By Kenneth Nehrbass
"Identity" "Identity politics" and "cultural identity" are hot topics now. Anyone involved in intercultural studies who wants to study "identity" must think through two major issues: 1) the relationship between identity and ethnography, and 2) the relationship between identity and racial awareness.
Identity and ethnography
All over the world, people seem to reify their behaviors as cultural facts. For example, I have heard Aussies avow their cultural identity in terms of informality ("We are so informal that we don't even call our physician 'doctor') and collectivism ("Don't be too puffed up: When a poppy stands out from the others, we clip it"). Or my East Asian students occasionally avow their Confucian penchant for self-improvement through education. So it is not just outsiders who attest to cultural stereotypes (perhaps to freeze the cultural expressions of the Other as backwards, or inferior); but cultural insiders also embrace, or freeze these cultural expressions when it is advantageous to them. The identification of these cultural differences has been a preoccupation of intercultural studies since Edward Hall popularized the field through the Foreign Service Institute.
Anyone who has spent time in other cultures recognizes difference. Yet, postmodernism has called into question all "facts" including "cultural facts." In fact, Wicker (in Werbner and Modood) argues that earlier anthropological notions culture were too essentialist about the differences-as if culture was a portable "rucksack" that could be carried around as a bounded whole -- homogenous and never changing. Instead, many sociologists and literary critics argue, all culture is is the current hodgepodge of hybridities (and that's all it ever has been, as societies borrow "culture" from others). Wicker calls this hybridizing process "creolization"-- taking something from the other, and making it your own. The process of "enculturation" then is not teaching a bounded cultural wholesale to children, but simply all the hybridization we go through, throughout our life. And he argues that this is not as much tied to ethnicity as it is to social class-- ethnic Chinese in the USA who have lots of social opportunities to hang out with the majority culture are going to hybridize more than the poorer Chinese in "ethnic enclaves."
Interestingly, the discussion of hybridity is polarized: critical, postcolonial theorists (like Bhaba) see hybridity as a way of asserting differentness, uniqueness, of saying "we aren't giving in to the global machine." Yet "globalists" who are fans of globalization, see the same data, yet interpret the hybridity of global trends (McDonalds, Christianity, etc ) as a way of ENTERING the global culture, not as a way of rejecting it.
To give a simple example of how culture is a hybrid rather than a static fact, I just came across a youtube video on the difference between public displays of affection in Japan compared to the USA. Yet postmodernism, and common sense in this globalized age, has caused us to question whether it would be possible to speak of a "Japanese attitude toward public displays of affection." Surely attitudes in the country of a 120 million vary widely, depending on religion, age, background, exposure to other cultures, etc. And this goes for Japanese, or American, attitudes about punctuality, authority, or any other feature we may consider "cultural." In short, postmodern (or critical) theorists argue that any reduction of behavior to "culture" is essentialist-- reifying culture as fact, rather than a social construction.
As Werbner pointed out, enthusiasts of multiculturalism are guilty of the same problem that racists are guilty of: assigning more value to "culture" than is due.
Identity and racial awareness
Instead, many postmodern interculturalists and sociologists are interested in an emerging field: cultural identity: how people continue to avow and attest stereotypes as "cultural facts." Cultural identity is not as much about the discovery and description of shared experiences, histories, values, beliefs and images-- that is the content of cultural studies or ethnography. Cultural identity is about how people who belong to certain socially-constructed groups think about their own similarity and difference in relation to the Other (this experience is called alterity). Cultural identity studies are about the continual negotiation - especially at a public level- of discourse about race, ethnicity, gender, etc. Cultural identity, then is a study of racial awareness. This is especially evident in Helms' (1995) model of "white racial identity development." The model has little to do with the shared cultural values and images of a "white culture"-- that would be the content of an ethnography; instead, the discussion of "white identity" looks at how white people become aware of their own whiteness in respect to other ethnicities (Rowe, Bennet, Atkinson, 1994). Cultural identity studies are also often about the experience of subaltern identity (being seen as lower, or being marginalized).
Cultural identity delves into political studies (especially identity politics). Bauman (in Werbner and Modood) argues that nation-states tend to annihilate or assimilate "strangers", in the effort to rouse up a sense of nationalism and peace. So they either totally assimilate the stranger (annihilate their cultural difference) or they totally marginalize.
But if, as postmodernism would argue, culture can no longer explain our differences, what can? Crenshaw argued that our identities are more than cultural, they are the synergistic result of the intersection of our class, gender, and ethnicity. Crenshaw's idea of intersectionality has taken on a life of its own in academia- generally trying to avoid the flaw of essentialism, but moving away from Crenshaw's original vision of social justice for doubly or triply-marginalized peoples (for example, the intersection of a gay African American male leads to greater marginalization than for a straight white female). And intersectionality has run into theoretical problems, like the difficulty of naming how many roads intersect (is it three, six, nine, or more?) But more significantly, intersectionality still relies on ethnicity as a "fact"- one that groupings actually share-- and thus in an attempt to avoid the error of reifying culture, it relies on culture as a fact.
Those interested in crossing cultures are likely to continue to be interested in ethnography-- describing and understanding shared experiences of different ethnolinguistic groupings. But such cross-cultural workers should also understand the field of cultural identity, since racial awareness is a salient experience of being "the Other" in this hybridized and globalizing world.
Anthias, Floya (2011) Intersections and Translocations: New Paradigms for Thinking about Cultural Diversity and Social Identities European Educational Research Journal, v10 n2 p204-217.
Helms, J. E. (1995). An update of Helms's white and people of color racial identity models. In J.G. Ponterotto, J.M. Casas, L.A. Suzuki, & C.M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (pp. 181-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rowe, Wayne; Bennett, Sandra K.; Atkinson, Donald R. (1994).White racial identity models: a critique and alternative proposal The Counseling Psychologist. Jan, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p129, 18 p. table; Sage
© 2015 Kenneth Nehrbass. All Rights Reserved.
Kenneth Nehrbass, Ph.D.
Associate Professor at Biola University, Author, Pastor